The Concept of Fasad as an Ecological Crisis in Surat Ar-Rum : 41 : A Comparative Study of Tafsir Al-Azhar and Tafsir Al-Misbah

Muhammad Achsanul Fawaid

Abstract


This study examines the interpretation of Surah Ar-Rum verse 41 regarding the concept of fasad as an ecological crisis according to Hamka and M. Quraish Shihab. Using a comparative approach, it highlights how their epistemological constructions and social backgrounds shape their understandings. Hamka interprets fasad as moral and spiritual decay resulting from a weakened human-divine relationship. Conversely, Shihab views it as the tangible impact of human exploitation and environmental pollution. By analyzing textual structure, social cognition, and historical context through Van Dijk’s theory, the study finds that while both scholars utilize similar sources, they differ in methodology and nuance: Hamka’s interpretation is characterized by moral preaching, while Shihab’s is contextual and applied. These findings underscore that Quranic exegesis is not merely textual but deeply influenced by the social and ideological factors that shape ecological narratives within the interpretation.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Amin. Aspek Epistemologis Filsafat Islam Dalam Filsafat Islam Kajian Ontologis, Epistemologis, Aksiologis, Historis, Prospektif. Yogyakarta: LESFI, 1992.

Afrasiabi, Kaveh L. Toward an Islamic Ecotheology, Dalam Islam and Ecology: A Bestowed Trust, R. C. Foltz, F. M. Denny, Dan A. Baharuddin (Eds.). USA: The President and Fellows of Harvard College, 2003.

Agwan, A. R. Islam and the Environment. New Delhi: Institute of Objective Studies, 1997.

Al-Dukhayl, Sa‘īd bin Fayīz. Nazhariyyah Al-Ifsād Fī Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī. Beirut, Lebanon: Dār al-Nafāʾis, 2008.

Al-Mas’udi, Hameed Hassoon Bjaiya. “Fairclough and van Dijk Models of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Kufa Journal of Arts 1, no. 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36317/kaj/2021/v1.i48.537.

Al-Mishnī, Musṭafā ʾIbrāhīm. “At-Tafsīr Al-Muqāran: Dirāsa Ta’sīliyyah.” Al-Sharī‘ah Wal-Qānūn 26 (2006).

Al-Qaṣṣāṣ, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bin Jamīl. “Maḥfūm Al-Fasād Wa Al-Ifsād Fī Ḍaw’ Āyāt Al-Qur’ān ‘Abd Al-Raḥmān Jamīl Al-Qaṣṣāṣ.” Majallat Kulliyat Al-Dirāsāt Al-Islāmiyyah Wa Al-‘Arabiyyah Lil Banāt Bi Iskandariyyah 20, no. 2 (2004). https://doi.org/10.21608/bfda.2004.224261.

Al, Agus Firmansyah et. “The Ecological Sustainability of The Earth System: Classical and Contemporary Interpretation of Surah Ar-Rum (Chapter 30), Verse 41.” Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner 2, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59944/amorti.v2i3.108.

Alfiyah, Avif. “Metode Penafsiran Buya Hamka Dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar.” Ilmu Ushuluddin 15, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v15i1.1063.

Amrullah, Haji Abdul Malik Karim. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional PTE LTD, 2003.

Ananda Rizki Prianka Putri, A. Halil Thahir, Robingatun, Khaerul Umam. “Metode Tafsir Hamka Dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar.” Gunung Djati Conference Series 29 (2023).

Azhim, Ali Abdul. Epistemologi Dan Aksiologi Ilmu Perspektif Al-Qur’an, Terj. Ahmaş Maskus Hakim. Bandung: Rosda Offset, 1989.

Dijk, Teun A. van. Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

———. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” London. Newbury Park and New Delhi 4, no. 2 (1993).

Eko Zulfikar, Kusnadi, Halimatussa’diyah, Nadia Azkiya. “Eko-Teologi Dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar: Upaya Hamka Dalam Membangun Paradigma Dan Berkesadaran Lingkungan.” The International Conference on Quranic Studies 1, no. 1 (2023).

Fadli, Masiyan, Musli. “Epistemologi Tafsir Al-Azhar Karya Haji Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah (Hamka).” AT-TIBYAN Journal Of Qur’an and Hadis Studies 6, no. 2 (2023).

Ghafur, Saiful Amin. Profil Para Penafsir Al-Qur’an. Edited by Pustaka Insan Madani. Yogyakarta, 2008.

Hamka, Rusydi. Pribadi Dan Martabat Buya Hamka. Bandung: PT Mizan Publika, 2016.

Julkifli. “Kedudukan Dan Tugas Manusia Dalam Perspektif Tafsir Al-Qur’an Zubdatu At- Tafsir Karya Muhammad Sulaiman Abdullah Al Asyqar.” AMORTI: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner 1, no. 2 (2022).

Juwita, D.R. “Fiqh Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Perspektif Islam.” El-Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Agama 5, no. 1 (2017).

Khalid, Fazlun. Signs on the Earth: Islam, Modernity and the Climate Crisis. Kube Publishing Ltd, 2019.

Lukman Hakim, Munawi. “Kesadaran Ekologi Dalam Al-Qur’an: Studi Penafsiran Al-Razi Pada QS. Al-Rum (30): 41.” Tafsé: Journal of Qur’anic Studies 5, no. 2 (2020).

M. Quraish Shihab. Membumikan Alquran: Fungsi Dan Peran Wahyu Dalam Kehidupan Maysarakat. Bandung: Mizan, 2004.

Munir, Misbahul. “Studi Komparatif Antara Tafsir Al Misbah Dan Tafsir Al Azhar.” MIYAH: Jurnal Studi Islam 14, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33754/miyah.v14i01.195.

Murni, Dewi. “Tafsir Al-Azhar (Suatu Tinjauan Biografis Dan Metodologis).” Jurnal Syahadah 3, no. 2 (2015). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32495/.v3i2.81.

Musaddad, Endad. “Metode Dan Corak Tafsir Quraish Shihab: Tela’ah Atas Buku Wawasan Al-Qur’an.” ALQALAM 21, no. 100 (2004). https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v21i100.1647.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. London: Unwin Paperbacks Universitas Indiana, 1990.

Nata, Abuddin. Tokoh-Tokoh Pembaharu Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.

Nurhayati, Khairul Muttaqin, Afifullah. “Restorasi Lingkungan Dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Tafsir Al-Mishbah (Pendekatan Teori Etika Lingkungan).” Al-Munir: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 5, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24239/al-munir.v5i2.346.

Ragin, Charles C. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, 2014.

Ramly, Nadjamuddin. Islam Ramah Lingkungan: Konsep Dan Strategi Islam Dalam Pengelolaan, Pemeliharaan, Dan Penyelamatan Lingkungan. Jakarta Selatan: Grafindo Khazanah Ilmu, 2007.

Ridho, Muhammad Izul, Safruddin Edi Wibowo, and Pujiono. “Relationships Of Human, Religion And Nature In Yusuf Qardawi’s Perspective.” ISLAMUNA: JURNAL STUDI ISLAM 10, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.19105/islamuna.v7i1. 8723.

Rifzikka, Safira Azmy. “Studi Analisis Tafsir Surah Ar-Rum Ayat 41 Tentang Kerusakan Lingkungan.” Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 9, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/jish.v9i2.23659.

Sa‘ūdī, Nashwā ‘Alī. Maḥfūm Al-Fasād Fī Al-Fikr Al-Siyāsī Al-Islāmī. Beirut, Lebanon: Maktabat al-Ādāb, 2019.

Setiawan, Rahmadi Agus. “Corak Penafsiran Muhammad Quraish Shihab Dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah.” MUSHAF JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran Dan Hadis 3, no. 1 (2023).

Shihab, M. Quraish. “Menyatukan Kembali Al-Qur’an Dan Umat.” Journal Ulumul Qur’an 5, no. 3 (1993).

———. Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan, Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Ciputat: Lentera Hati, 2005.

Tamara, Nasir. Hamka Di Mata Hati Umat. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 1984.

Ulyan, M. “Kontribusi Aspek Hukum Ekonomi Islam Dalam Perlindungan.” Amorti : Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner 2, no. 1 (2023).

Umi Bashyroh, Abdullah Mahmud. “Keseimbangan Ekologis Dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah (Studi Analitik Peran Manusia Terhadap Lingkungan).” Suhuf 33, no. 2 (2021).

Wartini, Atik. “Corak Penafsiran M. Quraish Shihab Dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah.” Hunafa Jurnal Studia Islamika 11, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v11i1.343.

Yayah, Jaka Ghianovan, Abil Ash. “Environmental Ethics in Tafsir of the Qur’an (Study of Surah Ar-Rum Verse 41 Quraish Shihab’s Perspective).” Jurnal USK, 2024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v7i3.40090.

Zuhdi, Muhammad Harfin. “Rekonstruksi Fiqh Al-Biah Berbasis Maslahah: Solusi Islam Terhadap Krisis Lingkungan.” Jurnal Istinbath, IAIN Mataram 14, no. 1 (2015).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.62376/tafasir.v4i1.125

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.